The skill of counter responsibility debate

The main points are as follows: 1) to choose a case with strong interest and performability with the Sophist; 2) to embarrass the Sophist with unexpected perceptual activity; 3) to explain the activity by using the method of sophistry and imitating the form of expression. Example:

A: Wash your hands before eating.

B: I'm not going to wash it!

A: Why?

B: If you wash it, it will be dirty. Why bother? So, I don't do such stupid things Hey, what are you doing with my food?

A: If you're full, you'll still be hungry. Why bother? So don't do such a stupid thing.

The outstanding feature of this technique is that it has both performance and gives the other party some kind of ridicule in action, so as to induce him to ask questions. Once asked, you will find yourself cheated. Generally speaking, this kind of practice has the meaning of punishment, anger and temptation. Only in this way can the other party be unable to restrain his anger and jump up to scold, so as to get into the designed trap.