How to get out of the trap of induced problem

Wang Gang is a university graduate. In an interview with a civil servant, the examiner asked, "which do you think is important, money, reputation or career?" Facing this kind of induced language trap, Wang Gang replied: "I don't think there is any contradiction among the three. As a highly educated college student, the pursuit of career success is of course the theme of his life. The way that the society affirms our cause is sometimes money, sometimes reputation, sometimes both. Therefore, I think we should get money and reputation in the process of pursuing our career, which are very important to us. "

This question seems to be a single choice question. It seems to contain a logical premise, that is, "the three are contradictory and can only choose one of them.". In fact, we must not fall into the trap of the other party. We must make a calm analysis. We can clearly point out that this logical prerequisite does not exist, and then explain the importance and unity of the three. For this kind of induced questions, we can't follow the examiner's intention to please the examiner. The result of doing so can only give the examiner the feeling of "this person has no idea and lacks the spirit of innovation".