The chair of the meeting should grasp the right time and be proper

This is often the case in meetings: sometimes people's opinions are concentrated, but the moderator of the meeting can't summarize them in time and ask them to turn to another topic, which leads to a cold scene and delays time; when asking for people's opinions, some people don't say a word, some people turn over and over, they can't talk about the point, and they get further and further apart; sometimes people argue endlessly and don't agree with each other

What should we do if there is a situation of silence, argument and digression at the meeting? This requires the moderator to have a detailed understanding of the meeting process, master the psychology of the participants, and guide the meeting appropriately and timely. When the opinions are basically the same, it shall be terminated immediately; when the opinions are similar, it is allowed to seek common ground while reserving differences and terminate in time; when it is difficult to reach a consensus, it shall be discussed again next time; for speeches that are too far away from the topic, the moderator of the meeting can find an opportunity to guide and remind them to get back to the topic. In order not to distract people's energy, waste their time and impact the central topic of the meeting, enterprise leaders must pay great attention to the timing and "heat" of the speech.

The moderator of the meeting should also pay attention to the weight and propriety of his speech. This is also a requirement of "degree".

The weight of language is composed of two main factors: word meaning and attitude. Word meaning refers to the original meaning of language, attitude refers to the expression and emotion. For example, if the enterprise leaders who preside over the meeting want to criticize the lower level personnel for their work mistakes or major mistakes, there is a problem of weight. If it's an individual and general mistake and the weight of criticism is too heavy, it's like making a mountain out of a molehill. I'm not convinced and everyone is not satisfied. If it is a big mistake and the criticism is too light, it will not achieve the purpose of educating oneself, but also give everyone a sense of protecting the parties, which can not play the role of warning others. Of course, there will be no good effect if we do not make specific analysis and convince people by reason, but go up to the outline without limit and make random comments. Therefore, according to the nature and degree of the problem, when speaking, there is a question of how to be appropriate between the heavy and the heavy.

Discretion is the measure of language. One is to pay attention to the subtle differences in meaning, especially the subtle differences between synonyms and synonyms. Second, pay attention to the difference between attitude and intonation, which will also affect the weight. Our aim is not only to clarify the problems, but also to educate the staff and workers. To point out the seriousness of the problem and make serious criticism, it is not necessary to be loud and fierce. Sharp language, rude attitude, and even hurtful, taking sarcasm, satire, and ridicule as a pleasure, will certainly cause the other party's antipathy and conflict, which is not conducive to the solution of problems and unity.