Bagu Township, Meigu County, Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province

Bagu Township

Bagu township is located 8 kilometers southwest of Meigu county. It is bounded by farming Township in the East, wagu and Ziwei Township in the south, yiluolada Township in the southwest, zogeyida Township in the northwest, and BAPU town in the northeast. The total area of the township is 45.46 square kilometers. The township government is located in Bagu, 2100 meters above sea level. It has jurisdiction over 9 villages and 42 groups of Naituo, lebu, niuluo, Xixian, Sangang, weilejue, Luozha, SANBI and Yiqian, with a total of 1941 households and 8321 people, including 8321 Yi people. The population density is 183 per square kilometer.

Historical evolution

On July 7, 1954, the jingyetexi working group sent a team to Sangang (now Sangang Village). In 1956, when the village was designated, it was the home of Buzi family members of Hei Yi people before liberation. It was called "buzletuo", so it was called buzletuo Township, and the rural labor association was established,

details

Acting on behalf of the township government. In October 1958, the Township People's Committee was established. It was renamed Sangang Township in 1960. In April 1968, the Township Reform Committee was established. On February 22, 1972, it was converted into a commune. On July 12, 1981, the commune reform committee was changed into the management committee. At the end of the year, it was renamed Bagu commune. In July 1984, the township system was restored and a township government was set up.

On January 12, 2021, the people's Government of Sichuan Province decided to cancel Bagu Township and put the administrative area of Bagu Township under the jurisdiction of BAPU town. The people's Government of BAPU town was stationed at No. 2, group 5, Hepu village.

survey

The weilejuehoushan copper mine area and niuniuba copper mine area in Bagu township are mainly distributed in Bagu Township and jingyetexi township. Some of them have been mined for many years and are exported to other places. Due to the high transportation cost and poor market, they are mined and stopped from time to time. In 1990, the total agricultural output value of the township was 949900 yuan (400000 yuan for agriculture, 58000 yuan for forestry, 297400 yuan for animal husbandry, 194500 yuan for sideline and fishery), with 5690 mu of cultivated land and 1079000 kg of grain output. The main products are corn, potato, buckwheat, pepper, apple, pear and walnut. There are 1128 yellow cattle, 7 Buffalo, 96 horses, 3047 pigs, 1056 goats and 1644 sheep. The township has one commercial purchasing and marketing group and one bank credit union, four rural primary schools with 206 students, one township health center and one medical staff.

Administration

Strengthened the comprehensive management, attendance, letters and visits, spiritual civilization and other daily affairs management, ensured the normal operation of the office work, and made the office work gradually standardized and institutionalized. We have repeatedly completed the work of organizing all work meetings of the county government, executive meetings of the government, office meetings of the county magistrate, etc. We should strengthen the comprehensive management of public security and pay close attention to the establishment of "safe units". Strengthen the management of vehicles and drivers, so that there is no traffic accident throughout the year, which provides a safety guarantee for government leaders to travel. By actively organizing various kinds of professional training, the staff's professional level, coordination and organizational ability have been significantly enhanced, and their ability to serve leaders, grassroots units and the masses has been further improved. Office work in the joint efforts of all staff, work has made new achievements, has been recognized by leaders and units. At the same time, we are also soberly aware that compared with the requirements of the new situation and new tasks, and with the work standards and requirements of the leaders of the county government, there is still a gap in our work. First, the awareness of service needs to be improved, and there are still many deficiencies in service mode, service means and understanding of service connotation; second, the role of providing assistance for leaders' decision-making is not enough, and the awareness of active participation is not very strong; third, due to the tense office work, the comprehensive and systematic theoretical training of employees needs to be strengthened. All these need to be explored and improved in the future work.