Only a fuzzy solution is given

It does not specify who is right and who is wrong, but only gives a vague solution, so that both sides of the dispute have a step to go down.

Some people quarrel because of a small matter, so that the contradiction intensifies. The main reason is not that the two sides in the dispute think how right they are and must defend the "truth", but that in order to maintain their face, they have to try to overcome each other to achieve balance, which is obviously extremely difficult. Then, as a mediator, it is not necessary to specify who is right and who is wrong at this time, so as not to further intensify the contradiction. It is only necessary to give a vague solution, so that both sides of the dispute can have a step down.

Recently, two middle-level executives have been acting abnormally and their relationship has deteriorated. The manager of the company called them and moved them: "you two are just like the two wheels of a car. As long as one of you leaves, the whole car can't move. I hope you can work together to make your work better. "

The two middle managers lack the consciousness of how to do as assistant to the general manager and the idea that the company is a game of chess. So the manager used metaphor to explain it

"The function of a department is like a housewife. If a housewife can do her best to make a good home, the householder can settle down and start a business in the company."

The assistant manager didn't decide who was right and who was wrong, so he simply gave a solution of "separate ways", which gave both of them a good reason to turn around and find a step down. In this way, the dispute between the two people was settled in an "obscure" way.