Use the dilemma reasoning to encircle left and right

The method of dilemma reasoning is to let the other side ride on the back of a tiger and get into a dilemma. That is to say, to refute a certain topic of the other party, logical reasoning is carried out, and two possible choices are obtained, so that the other party will fall into a dilemma no matter whether it affirms or denies one of them. For example, we are familiar with the fable "self contradiction" is a typical example. In our daily life, we often encounter the following problems:

A: Chuang Tzu is right. The debate can't tell.

B: the debate will tell.

A: who will judge the outcome? You judge that I don't agree, I judge that you don't agree, so let a third party judge? How do you know if his comments are right or wrong? It can be seen that his judgment needs to be judged by others. In this way, in essence, there is no final criterion. Therefore, the debate can not be divided.

B: I think the debate will tell.

A: you only talk empty words, but you can't make sense. It can be seen that you have already given up. You'd better admit defeat!

B: didn't you say the debate won't tell? How can we say that you beat me in our argument?

In this case, Party B uses contradictory connection to push Party A to the position of self contradiction. Although this method is simple, it requires high discerning ability of users, otherwise it can't find contradictions sensitively.