Refuse to drink by catching each other's loopholes

When the other party advises you to drink, you have to find a reason, which is sometimes unreliable. In particular, there are many loopholes in the advice of some not so clever wine persuaders. Seize these loopholes, analyze the truth, and finally prove that it's not you who should drink, but the other party, or other people. In a word, it's not over in the end. As long as the loophole is grasped accurately and the analysis is justified, the other party will have nothing to say and will have to give up this difficult "work object". For example, at a friend's party, someone advised you to drink like this: "Mr. Zhang, there are only two of us surnamed Zhang at this table. The same surname was the same family 500 years ago. It seems that we are predestined. This glass of wine should be killed!" At this time, you can catch his omission and refuse to drink like this: "Oh, I'd like to drink this wine with you, but I'm really sorry, you may have made a mistake. My" Zhang "is" Li Zao Zhang ", not" Gong Chang Zhang ", so I don't know whether these two surnames with different homonyms were the same family 500 years ago, so your wine is not good for me." If the other party's reason is not tenable, you can no longer be advised to drink.