Debate skills of the hot pursuit method

Hot pursuit is a very common way to deal with the mistakes of opponents. When the mistakes of the debater are discovered by our side, we should fight back and fight hard all the way. On the one hand, we should make the loopholes that have not attracted the wide attention of the audience obvious, so that people can pay attention to the opponent's mistakes; on the other hand, we should make him fall into a dilemma when he can neither admit his mistakes nor avoid the facts. The technique of this method is not very complicated. The main problem is to have an absolute grasp of the opponent's mistakes and be sure that it will not be a deliberately designed fraud. Then, with full confidence, we should show the momentum of "chasing the poor bandits bravely" and take advantage of the opportunity we have already taken to attack the Yellow Dragon.

In the 1990 Asian college debate contest, Nanjing University and Taiwan University competed for the championship. The debate was entitled "peaceful coexistence of mankind is a possible ideal". Taiwan University, on the other hand, issued a number when demonstrating its point of view: "there will be 12 wars every day in the world." This figure is obviously inaccurate. Nanjing University immediately seized the loophole, not only pointed it out immediately, but also repeatedly mentioned the inaccurate data of Taiwan University in the subsequent debate, which caused the passivity of Taiwan University.

In the first debate competition of Peking University, the Department of State Administration and the Department of history held a debate on "knowing the proprieties by being practical". In demonstrating the relationship between material and culture, the Zhengfang history team put forward: "in an economically developed country like Germany, great musicians such as Bach, Beethoven and Mendelssohn came into being..."

The opposition Department of state and politics immediately seized the name of "Beethoven" in the positive argument and launched a counterattack: "the positive argument is wrong. Beethoven wrote such a brilliant work as symphony of fate just under the circumstances of poverty!"

Then he must have enough food to create

Then, when did Beethoven write "Symphony of fate" after a full meal