Avoid the real and attack the false

Avoiding the real and attacking the false is a practical debating technique. When you have mastered part of the enemy's situation and want to further expand the outcome by attacking the opponent's weakness, you can use this method to make the opponent vulnerable. This method is often used in court debate or trial of criminals with strong antagonism.

It is a psychological war for criminal police to try criminals in the first instance, especially when they do not fully grasp the evidence. It is not only a kind of struggle, but also a kind of debate. If we are eager for success and go straight forward, it is often difficult to achieve results; however, if we use the method of avoiding the real and attacking the false, it is easy to open the mouth of criminals and urge them to tell the truth.

The criminal police captain of a city was ordered to investigate a vicious homicide case. After careful investigation, he found that the case was committed by two people, and then arrested a major suspect in a suburban county. Who's the other one? He refused to account. The interrogation began.

Do you know what we do

Criminal: "it's the police!"

Do you know where we are from

Then how do I know

Police: "let me tell you, we are from the two crossroads of XX city. Have you been to the two crossroads?"

I haven't been there

"That's not right. We checked a hotel there. You stayed there a few days ago."

Criminal: "what about living?"

P: "it's not so good to have lived. But there was a homicide the day before yesterday. Don't you know it? "

"I don't know. It's none of my business."

It has a lot to do with you

Criminal: "what!"

Police: "we found the blood clothes from the scene. Your family saw them and recognized that they were worn by you. Would you like to have a look? "

Make: "no, no, don't see."

It seems that you are a pleasant person. In that case, it's probably time for you to say something? "

"I was there when the driver was killed. You can't just say I killed him!"

Police: "that car has your fingerprint, can you push it?"

Criminal: "I didn't kill it myself anyway."

Police: "we know that you are not the one who did it. If you don't name your accomplice, you will have to answer the charge alone."

"I said He did it. I only helped. "

Who is that man

It's my cousin

In this way, the captain of the criminal police, true or false, insinuated and insinuated, completely collapsed the criminal's defense line and had to truthfully account for the murder.