Risk the world's great injustice

Risk the world's great injustice

No, wrong. Do something that everyone in the world thinks is wrong. It refers to doing so-called bad things and rescuing bad people in spite of the condemnation of the public opinion. It is unintentionally immoral and morally degenerated. There may be no good reward, because I unconsciously sacrifice my own good and accidentally have some bad character.

explain

Example: because the starter dares to issue this counter revolutionary order publicly, he must have the determination to completely break up and surrender. (Mao Zedong's "orders and talks for the South Anhui Incident") usage: as predicate, object and attribute; refers to the thing that made the biggest mistake.

source

"The eleventh year of seclusion in Zuozhuan:" it's not appropriate for a person to lose his teacher if he violates the five misdemeanors Xi Hou conquered Zheng, leaving not only a Chinese idiom with the largest number of words, but also the most commonly used Chinese idiom, which is called "beyond one's ability". Nowadays, "Bu Wei" has almost disappeared in the language, and is replaced by "beyond one's ability"; and "Bu Liang Li" has some writing difficulties, and is replaced by "beyond one's ability". "Risking the world's great injustice" and "overestimating oneself" originated from Zuozhuan. Without the historical event of "Xi Hou conquering Zheng", perhaps these two idioms would not exist in the Chinese world. Today's streets in Xi county will not have the statue of Lady Xi carved in white jade. It's certainly not these two idioms that can frighten me. What can be read from "Xi Hou attacking Zheng" is not only its failure -- from the fact that Xi Guo dared to invade Zheng who was a "little overlord" at the beginning of the spring and Autumn period, Xi Guo should have been very powerful at that time; and Xi Guo dared to "commit five misdemeanors" and invade Zheng, which is also a challenge to tradition. As for "knowing that the rest will die" and "not measuring one's strength", it should be an interpretation under the habitual thinking of "being wise after the event" and "the winner, the prince and the loser, the thief"!